Foreign and domestic experience in assessing student’s success in universities and colleges

Foreign and domestic experience in assessing student’s success in universities and colleges

The assessment system in various nations has its own peculiarities. As an example, in American advanced schooling institutions assessment of students is carried down in credits. Each credit takes a one-hour (50 min.) lecture, a presentation at a seminar or participation in a laboratory-practical (3-hour) class. In addition, pupils must invest a couple of hours on non-attendance training. Throughout the semester program (3 hours week that is per, 3 credits are credited for just two hours seminary classes, 3 credits for 2-3 hours laboratory lessons and something credit per semester.

Pupils take exams through the core procedures in the centre as well as the end associated with semester. Evaluate knowledge of the page system: A (“excellent”), B (“good”), C (“satisfactory”), B (“satisfactory with a minus”), E (“unsatisfactory”). In case of “satisfactory by having a minus” the learning student is obliged to hear this course once more also to pass the exam. The criterion of success is an average semester rating. Students regarded as being pupil whom received 2 points and higher. The surname regarding the pupil who scored 3.5 points is entered within the list that is honorary of dean’s office. A student whom scored from 1.7 to 1.99 points gets a caution about the want to improve performance, if he recovers this same rating or from 1.1 to 1.7, then gets a significant caution. In case a student receives 1.1 points for the semester or has warnings that are serious can not score a score of 2, or when after warning gaining lower than 1.7 points, he is taken removed from the college.

European connection with assessing student’s success

In Germany, students’ familiarity with advanced schooling institutions is evaluated for a system that is 5-point

  • “very good” (1),
  • “good” (2),
  • “satisfactory” (3),
  • “enough” (4),
  • “not sufficient” (5).

Success can be defined in credits. One credit hour per semester means the student must work within one week of 1 hour out of this discipline. For the 4-year term, the pupil must make 150-160 credits.

Italian universities are interested in an operational system of course exams, that are accepted by commissions consisting of three teachers, each of that could put at the most 10 points. The defense of written theses or even a draft in the front of a commission of 11 teachers is just a final exam. The total rating can reach 110 points.

The integration regarding the degree system to the European educational space, the development of a credit-module system in advanced schooling institutions, a unique place in the system of evaluation for the standard of professional training for the graduate, obliges each teacher to review the ability of foreign and domestic advanced schooling, artistically make use of it inside the practical task.

Rating system of pupil’s success evaluation

The rating system of assessment of real information mainly activates the student’s independent work, causes it to be rhythmic and systematic throughout the semester; better educated and cognitive activity is inspired, the part of advertising autonomy, initiative, responsibility, imagination in academic and intellectual activity increases; the objectivity of this evaluation is increased, very nearly completely unrelated towards the successful or unsuccessful response to the score or exam; the psychological stress throughout the test decreases somewhat. In addition, permits the instructor to individualize learning and a differentiated method of students, contributes to the logical construction associated with the student through the semester, specially throughout the exam sessions.

Implementation of the score system of assessment into the process quality writers that is educational the biased way of the assessment of students’ knowledge; acts as a successful method of motivating educational and intellectual activity; raises the pupil’s obligation for learning outcomes; encourages the utilization of the principle of individualization of training; eliminates the issue of attending classes; frees the student time for classes by interests; the character of cooperation prevails within the audience, the teacher ceases to be a supervisor, an such like.

Consequently, the instructor must be cautious and creatively to apply the requirements and norms for assessing the information, abilities and abilities of students. It must be directed by the scientific maxims for the methodology of academic work, attentively connect with each pupil, taking into consideration his inclinations, interests and aspirations, to demonstrate principles that are high tact.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *